|
Moderators:
·
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hoepken,
Member of the board, Southeast Europe Association, Director Georg-Eckert-Institute,
Braunschweig and
Heike Karge, Georg-Eckert-Institute,
Braunschweig
Rapporteurs: ·
Carl Bethke and Florian
Bieber
Working Group I addressed the educational sector from
the perspective of Serbia as a multiethnic and multicultural society.
Today the country is confronted with a double challenge: Firstly,
after the end of the Milosevic regime a sustainable modernisation
of the educational sector in general is urgently needed. Secondly,
decentralisation and more rights for minorities are also on the
agenda.
The participants of the workshop came from a broad range of backgrounds,
such as Serbian NGOs, alternative educational institutions, human
rights initiatives and academic experts, as well as minority representatives.
Among the minority representatives only some groups, such as Bosniaks,
Albanians and Germans, were represented, while others did not count
among the participants of the working group, among them ethnic Hungarians
and Croats. After a quick introduction, the members decided to discuss
four general topics pertaining to education in Serbia: General conditions
and problems of educational politics in Serbia, specific needs of
minorities, current challenges in the Sphere of Education, and a
concluding general discussion.
I. General conditions
and problems of educational politics in Serbia
1. The Need for Reform - Re-establishing
European Standards
The current situation of the educational system in Serbia is still
characterised by severe deficiencies and difficulties: First of
all in terms of infrastructure, technological equipment and teacher
training, but also concerning the necessity for a general renewal
of the staff. A large part of the intellectual elite has left the
country in the past decade. In key areas Yugoslavia is still lagging
far behind European standards. After a decade of xenophobia and
traumatisation, the meaning, functioning and content of education
have to be redefined, i.e. in the current debate on the reintroduction
of religious education. In fact, further reform efforts are in urgent
need.
2. National Councils and Decentralisation
Besides these more general issues a public discussion
in Serbia about a proposed new minorities law at the Yugoslavian
level is emerging. It foresees the election of National Councils
by the ethnic minorities. On the Serbian side the creation of National
Councils is sometimes criticised because of the possible danger
of segregation. Especially in regard to the school system the National
Councils would have had a far-reaching impact. The needs, structures
and experiences are, however, very different among the different
ethnic communities. At the same time the future territorial and
regional structure of the country remains unclear. Meanwhile there
is at least a tentative consensus in Serbia about the need for some
degree of decentralisation. Several proposals in the panel aimed
at strengthening local self-government. In the educational sector,
participation of non-state, i.e. private initiatives, should be
encouraged, either as sponsors, as administrators, or as consultants
on the contents of the curriculum.
II. Specific Minority Issues in Education
1. Textbooks and Curricula
Both representatives of minorities and Serbian
experts criticised the lack of content pertaining to the culture
of minorities, as well as the ethnocentric presentation of Serbian
history in the textbooks. As an alternative, an intercultural core-curriculum
was proposed, which should be an integrative factor for all citizens.
More specific contents for special ethnic groups could be freely
added to this core. Representatives of the Bosniak-inhabited Sandžak
region noted the need for more scientific projects on their region
and the history and culture of Bosniaks, both of which has been
neglected in the past. Another suggestion proposed the creation
of bilateral and regional commissions for the verification of textbooks,
especially concerning sensitive issues such as genocide, ethnic
cleansing, and World War II. Experts on the educational system assessed
that the end of the monopoly on schoolbook authoring and publishing,
financed by the state, would have a beneficial impact on the content
of education in Serbia. In the future, different authors and publishing
houses should have the opportunity to broaden the choice for teachers
and students.
2. Bilingualism
Civil rights activists advocated an extension of bilingualism in
administration and public education. Bilingualism would thus not
only be taught to members of the minority, but in some cases also
to Serbs, who would be able to learn the language of the minorities.
Especially in the light of providing multi-lingual public administration
in areas with a significant number of minorities, such a measure
should be considered.
3. New minorities
and Serbs from Croatia and Bosnia
Flexible solutions are necessary for the so-called "new minorities",
ethnic groups, which have emerged as minorities due to the disintegration
of Yugoslavia, such as Bosniaks. To a certain degree their situation
is dependent on an improvement of mutual relations between the now
independent states. Similarly Serb refugees from Croatia and Bosnia
form a specific type of cultural minority in Serbia with a need
for a greater degree of state-recognition of their cultural and
linguistic heritage. As it remains unclear which proportion of this
group will eventually return to their homeland and who will remain
in Yugoslavia, flexible and informal mechanisms for their inclusion
into the educational system needs to be established.
4. Roma
Not only cultural barriers determine the dismal situation of the
Roma population but also huge social problems. Furthermore, the
group itself is highly diversified in terms of language and religion,
what makes it even more difficult to develop concise educational
programs for the minority. Frequently Roma fail to pass the entrance
exam for primary schools, as the test emphasis the knowledge of
Serbian, which de-facto discriminates Roma children again whose
knowlegde of the language is frequently considerably lower than
that of Serb children. Experts claim that girls are regularly taken
out of school early by their parents only to get married very young,
further reducing the impact of formal education. The educational
barrier is a severe obstacle to overcome poverty, to strengthen
the social integration and to develop an elite that could effectively
articulate community interests. Massive support both by the Serbian
government and the international community is thus urgently needed
III. Current Challenges in the Sphere
of Education
1. Recognition of Diplomas
A significant number of members of national minorities
in Serbia are heavily impacted by the non-recognition of diplomas
from universities and other educational institutions in South-eastern
Europe. Especially Hungarians with diplomas from Hungary, Croats
with Croatian degrees, Bosniaks with diplomas from Bosnia-Herzegovina
and Albanians with degrees from Kosovo or Albania frequently encounter
difficulties in nostrifying their documents in Serbia. This lack
of recognition creates a significant disadvantage for minorities
in search of jobs, especially in the public sector. This problem
also affects Serb refugees which commenced (or completed) their
studies at universities outside Serbia and cannot transfer their
past studies to Serbian universities.
The participants proposed to create a regional centre, which is
charged with ensuring the region-wide recognition of university
diplomas. For the particular case of the recognition of diplomas
of the Albanian university in Prishtina, it was recommended to charge
UNMIK in Kosovo with the recognition of these diplomas.
2. Alternative
Educational Institutions
Alternative educational institutions have played a key role
in the past decade under the rule of Slobodan Milosevic in the sphere
of education, as well as in maintaining a democratic alternative.
After the democratic change in Yugoslavia/Serbia the alternative
educational institutions are confronted with new challenges and
opportunities.
Firstly, these institutions need to be legally recognised as educational
institutions, and not merely as NGOs, as it has been the case until
now. This would allow the institutions to issue diplomas and ensure
their recognition in Serbia.
Secondly, a close symbiosis between state-run institutions and alternative,
i.e. privately financed, institutions needs to be established. Both
from the point of view of methodology and the content of the academic
offerings of the alternative institutions, these can be of great
significance for the reform of public education in Serbia. The experience
of the alternative system needs to be made available to public institutions.
As a proportionally low number of students currently benefit from
the alternative educational institutions, this relationship can
help to broaden the number of beneficiaries of modern teaching methods
and curricula.
Finally, alternative educational institutions can play a key role
in providing education to minorities. Its flexible and adaptable
structures, as well as the experiences with multicultural curricula
make these institutions an attractive choice for future education
for minorities.
3. Teacher Training
and Equipment
The weaknesses of the educational system, both in terms of equipment
and training, needs to be met by strengthening the training of teachers.
Any necessary reform of the curricula and school books needs to
be supplement with (re-)training teachers, in order to ensure that
teachers have the tools and knowledge to transmit the news methods
and contents.
Especially members of 'new minorities' and minorities, which have
been neglected in the past decade in the education system, such
as Roma and Albanians, have to receive particular attention.
In the field of equipment and teacher training international donors,
as well as the motherland of the respective minority, are particularly
needed to financially support the reform and modernisation in Serbia.
IV. Concluding Remarks
1. Integration and Segregation
In Serbia, as in other European countries
with significant minority populations, the need arises to strike
a balance between mechanisms to protect and promote minorities through
education and promoting integration of minorities into a diversified
educational system of the country.
While integration shall not serve as a pretence to ignore minority-specific
contents and neglect minority representation, there is a need to
prevent the emergence of an educational system, which provided entirely
different contents to members of different nations.
During the discussions a consensus emerged on the need to reduce
the distance between majority and minority in the future educational
system of Serbia. At the same time it will be difficult to balance
between integrative measures and institutions and curricula catering
specifically to minorities.
2. Distance Between
the Majority and the Minority and Confidence Building Measures
The significant distance between majority and minorities
and widespread prejudice remains a hurdle for the development of
harmonious interethnic relations in Serbia. Besides prejudices transmitted
through informal education outside the educational system, through
the media, family and friends, stereotypes in institutions and curricula
continue to stand in the way of improving interethnic relations.
As a first step, the contents transmitted in class have to be cleared
of the stereotypes and prejudices towards minorities and other nations.
As further step the curriculum needs to move away from an ethnocentric
worldview to an appreciation of diversity and a promotion of interethnic
tolerance.
V. Recommendations for Short-Term Measures
in the Sphere of Education
The problems of the Serbian educational system
require a fundamental long-term reform, which cannot be achieved
without a complete overhaul of structures and contents. Nevertheless,
a number of short-term steps can help to build confidence and provide
for an improvement of interethnic relations in Serbia.
During the discussion a number of proposals have been made - some
of which are mentioned above - which could be implemented swiftly
and address some immediate concerns of minorities:
Eliminating stereotypes and hate speech from school books.
Creating a mechanism for the nostrification of non-Serbian diplomas.
Establishing cross-border mechanisms for the bi- or multilateral
verification of schoolbooks.
Ending the monopoly of schoolbook publishing.
Recognising privately financed educational institutions. |