Logo SOG
 
 
  Project: "The Future of the Western Balkan Region: Montenegro"
 


Herceg Novi, March, 28 - 30, 2003

Report of Working Group I:
Higher Education, Science and Vocational Training

   
 

Moderators: ·
Dr. Zuzana Finger, Heinrich Boell Foundation, Belgrade
Dr. Wim van Meurs, Centre for Applied Policy, Munich
Rapporteurs:
Dr. Marie-Janine Calic and Marcus Delacor

The working group "The future of higher education, science and vocational training" discussed various aspects of the Montenegrin educational system, whereas research and development was a secondary issue only. As most of the working group participants were NGO representatives, academics and teachers (but unfortunately there were no representatives from the relevant ministries), the discussion evolved around five main themes:

  Minority representation in the educational system
  Regional co-operation in higher education, including co-operation within the new state union of Serbia and Montenegro
  Europeanisation of the educational system including the creation of a European space for higher education
  Reform of higher education and vocational training - also with respect to the consequences of political and economic transformation for higher education, both in terms of resources and in terms of requirements, as well as the issue of brain drain.
  The role of international actors.
     
   
     

1. Minorities
Montenegro can be regarded as a multi-ethnic society. Agreement existed among the participants that this fact needs to be reflected in the educational system and that efforts that have been undertaken to keep the educational system open for minorities have to be continued and possibly reinforced. During the discussion issues such as the question of enhancing education in minority languages, nostrification of diplomas, equal representation in designing educational policies including writing of text books, participation of minority representatives in supervisory institutions, and enhancing capabilities to master majority and minority languages, were raised.
The strategic issue behind the debates concerned the contrasting approaches to general minority issues: advancement through integration and affirmative action versus advancement through segregated institutions and proportional representation.
For instance, the question as to whether and how Albanian history should be taught was discussed. However, there was no agreement with regard to some concrete recommendations that were made by participants, such as increasing the number of school inspectors of ethnic Albanian origin, including subjects in the curricula that are of particular importance for shaping national identities of the minorities (history, geography, literature etc.), moving the Teachers Training College for Albanian-speaking teachers from Niksic to a city where Albanians are in the majority, expanding teaching in minority languages. There was, on the other hand, agreement that more efforts have to be made to develop common approaches with regard to curricula, language teaching in minority areas and awareness raising. Evidently, whereas cultivation of minority identities is a legitimate objective, majority representatives expressed concerns that an exclusivist approach and institutional segregation might be detrimental to the consolidation of the Montenegrin state and the integration of society - as it has happened in other countries in the region. Conversely, minority representatives perceived a strong centralising tendency in Montenegrin educational policies.

2. Reform of higher education and vocational training
Higher education and vocational training play a vital role in the development of a functioning (civil) society through the promotion of equal opportunities, life-long learning, and encouragement of participation in political and social life. They are also an essential prerequisite for promoting economic transition and economic growth. However, the economic capacity of Montenegro to develop a high quality educational system is limited. As a strategic dilemma, economic progress is a prerequisite for the development of a modern system of higher education, while at the same time no educational reform will be feasible without the resources and demand generated by a transformed economy. Consequently, the government and international organisations have a key role to play in preventing brain drain and in reforming the educational system. Higher education in particular finds itself dependent on the economic situation. Positively, it can also drive the economic development and supply the Montenegrin economy with the required human resources. There is a need for strategic decisions that point out the relevant economic fields and chances of the labour market and lead to an improved adjustment of the system of higher education and vocational training. The need for strategic choices and prioritisation is also linked to the fact that the resources in the small state of Montenegro do not permit a comprehensive range of disciplines and faculties for education and research.
The system of higher education in Montenegro has suffered from the academic isolation of the recent past, the under-developed infrastructure and institutional conservatism at the universities, the complicated political involvement and the poor economic situation. First steps to reform the educational system have been undertaken. The efforts for the modernisation of the universities in line with European standards have to be continued and the independence and autonomy of the university to be ensured. Among the main objectives are the development of new forms of educational management, methods of quality assurance, mutual recognition of diplomas and curriculum development. A typical factor hampering educational reform is the decentralised, fragmented structure of the only university with limited co-operation between the various departments.

 
Recommendations:
  undertake an in-depth needs assessment with regard to the requirements and opportunities of the labour market and the economic system of Montenegro from which recommendations for further reform priorities should be derived,
  improve quality standards, capacities and equipment of higher education in order to meet the increasing demands of the younger generation,
  increase synergies through enhanced co-operation of different departments within the university of Montenegro,
  introduce a system of evaluation and assessment at the university in order to raise quality standards,
  focus higher education on subjects that are relevant to economic growth and development, e.g., establish a management school or a department for tourism at the university,
  adapt standards and implement reforms in order to meet the requirements of the European space for higher education,
  consider a differentiated system of higher education (institutions for applied studies in addition to university).
     
   
     

3. Regional co-operation and Europeanisation of higher education
Regional and European co-operation can support the development of the Montenegrin educational system and offer complementary benefits. Networking and cross-border activities provide also an opportunity for good neighbourly relations and intercultural dialogue and can result in creating synergies and avoiding duplication. However, financial and logistical concerns as well as the problem of the nostrification of diplomas and credits prevent most students from considering studying in the near abroad. Little attention was payed to the issue of higher-education co-operation within the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, considering the fact that Podgorica cannot afford to create of comprehensive university with all disciplines and faculties by itself. Instead, options for Montenegro's integration in European programmes for higher education were discussed eagerly. Participants underlined that Montenegro has taken part in the Tempus programme and should explore further opportunities to connect its university with the international/European academic environment. The lack of resources and the poor state of higher education in Montenegro has so far prevented a significant influx of foreign exchange students.

Recommendations:
  Mutual recognition of diplomas and university degrees with neighbouring countries, e.g. with universities in Albania
  Widen the opportunities to take part in the TEMPUS programme
  Include Montenegro in EU students exchange programmes (SOCRATES et al.)
  Increase the opportunities for visiting professors at the University of Montenegro
  Increase number of students from abroad
  Take part in the Bologna Process
  Enhance co-operation with NGOs

 

  agenda Aufzaehler
report working group II Aufzaehler
report working group III Aufzaehler
list of participants Aufzaehler
     
 
© 2008 Southeast Europe Association. All Rights Reserved